Home » 2019 Spring
Category Archives: 2019 Spring
Session 3: 5/6 & 5/16
In this session both groups reviewed two cases focused on classroom management and discussed how areas of the motivational framework might be applied. The first case was about a Professor having to repeat a lesson to frustrated students who then exhibited disruptive behavior as their response to being denied explanation by the instructor. The second case presented a situation where there was repeated disruptive and antagonistic behavior by the students.
In the first case, participants noted how there seemed to be a lack of self-reflection or awareness from the instructor as well as disrespect or disingenuousness when asking the students if they had any final questions but was not intending on answering anything. The instructor needed to reflect on the clarity of the lesson and the wording of the questions. With regards to the motivational framework the group noted two parts:
Competence: The instructor might try to assess student learning in pieces with specific exercises and activities paired with the lesson to measure students’ understanding of the lesson.
Inclusion – The instructor might work on his/her own discourse and demeanor with students. The goal is to avoid being dismissive.
Meaning – Ask students what they understand and then build from there.
Attitude – ask students how they might prefer a repetition of the material, polling them on what delivery methods you might use to further explain/illustrate a lesson.
—
In the second case we talked about how important it is to have meaningful relationships with each students and it’s worthwhile having individual discussions about controlling behaviors to find resolution to issues or problems happening in the classroom.
Inclusion – It’s important for instructors to model/encourage respect and find ways to share their authority with students when/where appropriate.
Attitude – sometimes a teacher’s attitude may need adjustment, not just a student’s
Meaning – Instructors may want to consult with students privately to get a the root of issue/attitude especially when expectations from the teacher/student are mismatched.
Session 2: 4/8 and 4/10
In this session we considered a case on activities. In this case, a professor assigned a difficult readon on Marx and students were frustrated. One student, in particular, who had lived under communism, was angry. The professor used this student’s perspective to generate new questions to explain Marx, but became the sole knowledge base on the topic.
We discussed the following question: Which aspect(s) of the motivational frameworkmight help Professor X in designing activities that better engage students?
Responses included:
Meaning: Ask students reflect on their own economic situation to make the topic more relevant; invite student to select passages that they find meaningful and reflect on these
Inclusion: Have students work in groups and jigsaw so that they connect with each othe
Attitude: Invite students to negotiate supplemental texts so they have some choice; invite student to select passages that they find meaningful and reflect on these
Competence: Journal logs allow students to show reactions, inferences, and assertions to show that they’ve understood the text and class discussion and/or faculty feedback can confirm what students understand of the text
Session 1; 3/18 & 3/21
The group reviewed module case studies for Grading & Assessment with regards to the CRT Framework:
Competence: How might the instructor enhance students’ understanding that they are becoming more effective in authentic learning that they value?
Inclusion: How might the instructor help students feel respected by and connected to other students and the teacher?
Meaning: How might the instructor engage students in challenges that include the learner’s perspectives and values and is meaningful to them?
Attitude: How might the instructor offer students more meaningful choices that promote greater personal relevance so that students want to learn?
We discussed the following points of observation:
- At times both teacher and student expectations can be incongruent.
- Care needs to be made explicit to students. (But there still needs to be reasonable boundaries.)
- How can we get students to utilize their given strengths to do the work of the course?
- What power dynamics are at play in a classroom with regards to assessment/grading?
- How might we balance the content of the work with the teacher/student relationship?
- Context matters – Where do teachers have these conversations about grades, assessment, and performance with students? (In front of everyone or privately?)
- Why are certain grading practices elusive to students? – What can teachers do to help students understand the rationale behind a specific grading practice?
Next Meeting for Group 1: Monday 4/8 at 11:30AM
Next Meeting for Group 2: Thursday, 4/11 at 12:40PM
